What type of language constitutes "fighting words" in the context of disorderly conduct?

The concept of "fighting words" refers to speech that is likely to provoke a violent reaction from the listener. The correct answer identifies offensive and obscene language as falling under this category. Such language can evoke strong emotional responses, creating a heightened risk of conflict or violence.

In legal terms, "fighting words" are often defined by their ability to incite an immediate breach of peace. Words that are offensive or obscene typically aim to insult or demean another person in a direct and aggressive manner, which aligns with the nature of language that can lead to disorderly conduct. This definition arises from legal precedents that focus on the potential for certain phrases to disrupt public order or instigate violent confrontations.

In contrast, polite and courteous phrases do not have the incendiary nature required to be classified as "fighting words." Words used in jest or humor are not necessarily intended to provoke violence and often aim to entertain or lighten a situation, thereby lacking the same incitement to disorder. General criticisms, while they can be negative, typically do not reach the threshold of provoking a violent response without the accompanying element of offensiveness or obscenity.